Pragmatic Analysis on Political Text in Posters, Slogans and Jingles in Davao Del Norte, Philippines

Authors

  • Armand James A. Vallejo Tagum College, Tgaum City Davao del Norte, University of Mindanao, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jmsss.v1i1.60

Keywords:

Politics, Mid-Year Election, Pragmatics, University of Mindanao, Philippines

Abstract

Elections in the Philippines covered with a lot of controversies. Among those recognized political parties, two were most coveted for a position. These are the Hugpong ng Pagbabago (HNP) and Partido Demokratiko Pilipino-Lakas ng Bayan (PDP-Laban). Meanwhile, due to the same interest of both parties, they fought one another for a position using striking, deceiving, and powerful words to convince the people. The purpose of this study is to identify the pragmatic acts on the political text in posters, slogans, and jingles. Employing a qualitative content analysis approach, the corpora were retrieved and purposively identified across Davao del Norte Philippines. Data were analyzed by identifying the pragmatic acts. Results revealed that the political paraphernalia used by the aspirant politicians that are based on the pragmeme consist of activity part or also known as interactants and textual part or context. In the context parts, it identified the pragmatic features such as Reference (REF), Inference (IR), Relevance (REL), Voice (VC), Shared Situation Knowledge (SSK), Metaphor (M), and Shared Cultural Knowledge (SCK). Also, the politician employed different contextual backgrounds to ‘pract’ declaring, comparing, emphasizing, offering, claiming, committing, and predicting. Thus, it is recommended to explore the features in the linguistics aspects to deepen the understanding of the language used by the political candidates for a specific position. Also, widen the scope of the study to pragmatize the language

References

Ansari, M. Z., Aziz, M. B., Siddiqui, M. O., Mehra, H., & Singh, K. P. (2020). Analysis of political sentiment orientations on twitter. Procedia Computer Science, 167, 1821-1828.

Denter, P. (2013). A theory of communication in political campaigns. University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science, Discussion Paper, (1302).

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 3(2), 193-217.

McGregor, S. C. (2020). “Taking the temperature of the room” how political campaigns use social media to understand and represent public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(S1), 236-256.

Medina Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O., & Hegelich, S. (2020, July). Dancing to the partisan beat: A first analysis of political communication on TikTok. In 12th ACM conference on web science (pp. 257-266).

Odebunmi, A. (2008). Pragmatic functions of crisis-motivated proverbs in Ola Rotimi'sThe Gods Are Not to Blame. Linguistik online, 33(1).

Park, H. M. (2009). Politic confrontation process analysis of the authorities since global banking crisis occurrence. Korean Business Review, 22(1), 103-123.

Ross, A. S., & Caldwell, D. (2020). ‘Going negative’: An appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & communication, 70, 13-27.

Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Valle-Cruz, D. (2020). Sentiment analysis of facebook users reacting to political campaign posts. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 1(2), 1-13.

Steffan, D. (2020). Visual self-presentation strategies of political candidates on social media platforms: A comparative study. International Journal of Communication, 14, 23.

Warren, M. E. (2002). What can democratic participation mean today? Political theory, 30(5), 677-701.

Weidman, A. (2014). Anthropology and voice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 37-51.

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Vallejo, A. J. A. (2022). Pragmatic Analysis on Political Text in Posters, Slogans and Jingles in Davao Del Norte, Philippines. Journal of Metrics Studies and Social Science, 1(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.56916/jmsss.v1i1.60