An Evaluation of the Teachers Mate 1 (TM1) Laptop for Pre-tertiary school Teachers using the Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Approach in the Tamale Metropolis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v4i2.1147Keywords:
TM1 Laptop, Consumer-Oriented Evaluation, Teacher Satisfaction, Educational TechnologyAbstract
This study evaluates the Teachers Mate 1 (TM1) laptop initiative for pre-tertiary school teachers in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana, using the Consumer-Oriented Evaluation Model. The initiative aimed to enhance teaching and learning through laptop distribution. Guided by Scriven’s model, the study assessed the laptops’ effectiveness from the users’ perspective. A cross-sectional survey design was employed, with data collected from 260 teachers across eight senior high schools using structured questionnaires. The sample was determined using the Yamane formula, with proportional random sampling ensuring representation. Data analysis, conducted using SPSS (version 26), revealed that 56.5% of respondents felt the laptops were not worth their cost, and 47.3% expressed dissatisfaction due to quality and performance issues. Gender disparities emerged, with male teachers more likely to own additional laptops. Despite these concerns, 63.5% of respondents rated the initiative positively, indicating mixed perceptions. The study underscores the need for rigorous pre-implementation evaluations, incorporating user feedback and quality assurance measures. It recommends a structured stakeholder engagement process, including teachers, policymakers, and technology experts, to ensure future educational technology initiatives align with user needs and expectations.
References
Anjali, K. V, & Sumathi, Dr. C. (2024). Navigating Technological Integration: Stakeholder Dynamics In Bangalore’s Higher Education Landscape. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 11829–11836. https://doi.org/10.53555/KUEY.V30I5.5037
Chanuan, U., Kajohnsak, C., & Nittaya, S. (2021). Sample Size Estimation using Yamane and Cochran and Krejcie and Morgan and Green Formulas and Cohen Statistical Power Analysis by G*Power and Comparisions. Apheit International Journal. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ATI/article/view/254253
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2006-07381-012.html
Davidson, E. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ePfuba9tDbEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Davidson,+E.+J.+(2005).+Evaluation+methodology+basics:+The+nuts+and+bolts+of+sound+evaluation.Thousand+Oaks,+CA:+Sage&ots=opVAGrPDeS&sig=NyBzhXNBvIp-y4K-wBZcLfw2Rpo
Ghana Education Service. (2021, September 9). All About The Teachers Mate 1(TM1) Laptop. https://ges.gov.gh/2021/09/09/all-about-the-teachers-mate-1tm1-laptop/
Goldin, C. (2015). WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Hours Flexibility and the Gender Gap in Pay Hours Flexibility and the Gender Gap in Pay.
Goswami, A., Dutta, S., Goswami, A., & Dutta, S. (2015). Gender Differences in Technology Usage—A Literature Review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2016.41006
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Research Made Simple. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
Kitivo, E. M., & Kavulya, J. M. (2021). Evaluation of Training Programmes: A Review of Selected Models and Approaches. In International Journal of Educational Theory and Practice(IJETP) (Vol. 4, Issue 4). https://www.finessejournals.comhttps://www.finesseconnect.orghttp://www.finessejournals.com
Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage publications. www.sagepublications.com
Michael, J. , P., & Spencer, E. , H. (2020). Updating conceptions of validity and reliability. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 16(18), 1127–1130.
Moses Nkrumah. (2021, September 15). Teachers Mate 1(TM1) Laptop Price and Teachers Portion to Pay. https://briefghana.com/teachers-mate-1tm1-laptop-specifications/
Omair, A. (2015). Selecting the appropriate study design for your research: Descriptive study designs. Researchgate.Net. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-600X.159892
Parr, J. M. (2011). The Teacher’s Laptop as a Hub for Learning in the Classroom (Vol. 44, Issue 1).
Payne, D. A. (1994). Evaluation Metaphors. Designing Educational Project and Program Evaluations, 57–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1376-2_4
Sammy Wiafe. (2021, September 3). Government launches one teacher one laptop initiative. https://citinewsroom.com/2021/09/government-launches-one-teacher-one-laptop-initiative/
Sanders, J. (1994). The program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational programs. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7IgxKmrcvNwC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Sanders+et+al.+(n.d.),+who+emphasize+the+need+for+ongoing+assessments+to+ensure+that+programs+remain+relevant+and+effective&ots=fPQeh-maxr&sig=KM_I-GMhppemXHQXGOw8f32m_zQ
Sarantakos, S. (Sotirios). (2005). Social research. 509.
Scriven, M. (1994). Evaluation as a discipline. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(00)80010-3
Scriven, M. (2007). Key evaluation checklist. https://cnxus.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Scriven_Key20Evaluation20Checklist.pdf
Scriven, Michael. (1981). Evaluation Thesaurus. Third Edition. 174. https://www.academia.edu/69569052/Evaluation_Thesaurus_Third_Edition
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Scriven’s Consumer-Oriented Approach to Evaluation. Systematic Evaluation, 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5656-8_10
Wright, R. E. (2008). Student Evaluations and Consumer Orientation of Universities. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1300/J054v08n01_04, 8(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054V08N01_04
Xu-sheng, J. J. Y. (2019). Evaluation System Design of Innovative and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities ——From the Perspective of Consumer-oriented Evaluation Theory. Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science), 21(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.15936/J.CNKI.1008-3758.2019.01.012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hassan Mubarik Iddrisu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







