Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad 21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v4i4.1643Keywords:
Scientific approach, 21st-century skills, inquiry-based learning, elementary school, resource constraintsAbstract
Pendidikan abad 21 menuntut pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis, kreativitas, kolaborasi, dan komunikasi melalui pendekatan pembelajaran inovatif. Tujuan: Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan implementasi pendekatan saintifik berbasis keterampilan abad 21 di SDN Sepang, mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat, serta menggambarkan perkembangan keterampilan peserta didik. Metode: Penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dilakukan pada 28 siswa kelas V dengan pengumpulan data melalui observasi partisipatif (8 pertemuan) dan wawancara mendalam. Data dianalisis menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña. Hasil: Pendekatan saintifik (5M) berhasil diterapkan dengan partisipasi siswa mencapai 82% pada tanya jawab dan 76% pada diskusi kelompok. Keterampilan abad 21 berkembang signifikan: kemampuan bertanya meningkat dari 45% menjadi 78%, kreativitas mencapai 68%, kolaborasi 72%, dan komunikasi 80%. Faktor pendukung meliputi lokasi strategis, kesiapan guru, dan dukungan orang tua, sedangkan penghambat mencakup keterbatasan fasilitas, minimnya pelatihan guru (30%), dan penyalahgunaan teknologi (70%). Kesimpulan: Pendekatan saintifik efektif mengembangkan keterampilan abad 21 dalam konteks keterbatasan sumber daya melalui kreativitas guru dan kolaborasi stakeholder.
References
Andriana, E. M., Utami, R. D., & Sehati, A. (2021). Peningkatan kreativitas belajar peserta didik melalui pendekatan saintifik berbasis STEAM di sekolah dasar. Educatif: Journal of Education Research, 3(4), 51–60. https://pub.mykreatif.com/index.php/educatif/article/view/82
Arifin, M., Wulandari, A., & Erliani, S. (2025). Inovasi metode pembelajaran Al-Qur'an untuk menangkal dampak negatif teknologi pada anak sekolah dasar di Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58540/jurpendis.v3i1.750
Awang, H., Ling, L. S., Shaari, A. S., & Bakar, K. A. (2025). Barriers to implementing innovative pedagogy: A systematic review of challenges and strategic solutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.4.1
Banjar, R. P., Silaban, P. J., & Sitepu, A. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran tematik melalui pendekatan saintifik terhadap minat belajar siswa di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1007–1015. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.527
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education system alignment for 21st century skills: Focus on assessment. Brookings Institution: Center for Universal Education.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
Estrella, G., Au, J., Jaeggi, S. M., & Collins, P. (2018). Is inquiry science instruction effective for English language learners? A meta-analytic review. AERA Open, 4(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418767402
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457206
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Iskanto, I., Taufiqulloh, T., & Prihatin, Y. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi pedagogi dan penguasaan TIK guru terhadap hasil belajar pada pembelajaran kurikulum merdeka di SD. Journal of Education Research, 5(3), 4050–4059. https://www.jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/view/1522
Jayanti, N. K. D. A., & Cesaria, A. (2024). Dukungan orang tua dalam pembelajaran: Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 15(1), 45–56.
König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Is teachers' general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.004
Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.014
Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Munawir, M., Salsabila, Z. P., & Nisa', N. R. (2022). Tugas, fungsi dan peran guru profesional. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i1.327
Muslimin, M. (2020). Program penilaian kinerja guru dan uji kompetensi guru dalam meningkatkan prestasi kerja guru. Indonesian Journal of Education Management & Administration Review, 4(1), 1–10. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/ijemar/article/view/4384
Ni'mah, A., & Sukartono. (2022). Upaya guru dalam meningkatkan kreativitas berpikir peserta didik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 6(2), 173–179. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJL/article/view/48157
Norjanah, N., Nasir, M., & Mauizdati, N. (2022). Kompetensi guru dalam mengembangkan pendidikan agama Islam berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 5130–5137. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.3051
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Pribadi, R. A., Sailendra, D. P., & Azmi, F. (2022). Pendekatan saintifik untuk mengembangkan keterampilan abad 21 pada peserta didik sekolah dasar. Ibtida'i: Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar, 9(1), 43–56. https://ftk.uinbanten.ac.id/journals/index.php/ibtidai/article/view/5245
Rachman, A., & Verawati, I. (2022). Pentingnya dukungan orang tua dalam penguatan literasi berbasis pembiasaan bagi siswa sekolah dasar. Tunas: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.33084/tunas.v8i1.3181
Sarah, T., & Witarsa, R. (2023). Pengaruh pembelajaran kolaborasi terhadap keterampilan menirukan gerak hewan pada siswa sekolah dasar. Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 226–233. https://www.jer.or.id/index.php/jer/article/view/152
Setiawan, A. A., Cuarni, C., Ardianti, D., Kurniati, I., Maryana, M., Suryani, N., & Veronika, V. (2023). Pengembangan kreativitas melalui pemanfaatan barang bekas menjadi media edukasi untuk anak usia dini. Jurnal Masaliq, 3(1), 82–90. https://ejournal.yasin-alsys.org/masaliq/article/view/793
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Sultanni, M. S. (2024). Analisis aktivitas peserta didik dalam pembelajaran praktikum melalui pendekatan saintifik sebagai implementasi keterampilan abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 554–560. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/semnasipa/article/view/726
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J. M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., Lubart, T., & Besançon, M. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
Ummah, N. R., Qodariyah, N. A., & Nurtamam, M. E. (2025). Faktor sosial ekonomi keluarga: Analisis pada hasil belajar matematika siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 6(1), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.52060/jipti.v6i1.2891
Utami, R. S., Haloho, M. A. F., Tambunan, K., & Sinaga, M. M. (2022). Dampak penggunaan gadget terhadap prilaku sosial anak usia sekolah dasar. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Widyaloka, 1(2), 25–30. https://jurnal.amikwidyaloka.ac.id/index.php/jstekwid/article/view/69
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179–225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791
Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20329
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elpin Oktaviani, Zerri Rahman Hakim, Reksa Adya Pribadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
