Artificial Intelligence (AI): Perception and Utilization of AI Technologies in Educational Assessment in Nigerian Universities

Authors

  • Abdul-Wahab Ibrahim Sule Lamido University
  • Ali Abdullahi Taura Department of Education, Sule Lamido University Kafin Hausa, Jigawa State
  • Abdullahi Iliyasu Department of Education, Sule Lamido University Kafin Hausa, Jigawa State
  • Yusuf Olayinka Shogbesan Department of Arts and Social Sciences Education, Osun State University Osogbo, Osun State
  • Shehu Adaramaja Lukman Department of Educational Foundations, Federal University Gusau, Zamfara State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v3i3.763

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Perception, Utilization, Educational Assessment

Abstract

The ubiquity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has generated different perceptions and views regarding its usefulness in conducting educational assessment in Nigerian universities. This study determined whether academic integrity and innovative assessment concerns affect how university teachers utilize diverse AI tools in educational assessment. It also investigated if university teachers’ perception of using AI tools is likely to be associated with their tendency to personalize AI use at universities in the country. The study adopted inferential research design. 3,083 university teachers comprised the population in the study, out of which the sample of 322 participants who are professors, associate professors, and senior lecturers from government and privately-owned universities, were randomly selected for the study. The instrument was a 4-point scale questionnaire titled: “University Teachers’ Perception and Utilization of AI Questionnaire (UTPUAIQ).” The data were analyzed using independent t-test, Pearson Product Moment Correlation and Chi-Square statistics, as percentile analysis was explored using simple percentage statistical procedure. The results revealed that academic integrity concerns have an influence on how university teachers perceive AI use in assessment; that perception for innovative assessment concerns at university significantly affects how university teachers utilize diverse AI tools in educational assessment; and that university teachers’ perception of using AI tools is likely to be associated with their tendency to personalize AI use at universities. It was concluded that AI use in educational assessment is in itself not harmful but the potential risks involved must be mitigated as it is deployed for use for students’ assessment at universities in Nigeria. Hence, there is a need to ensure the ethical, inclusive and equitable use of AI in educational assessment at universities in the country.

References

Aluthman, E. S. (2016). The effect of using automated essay evaluation on ESL undergraduate students’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6(5), 54-67.

Baker, T., Smith, L., & Anissa, N. (2019). Educ-AI-tion Rebooted? Exploring the future of artificial intelligence in schools and colleges. London, NESTA. https://www. nesta.org.uk/report/education-rebooted.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Delipetrev, B., Tsinarakii, C., & Kostic, U. (2020). Historical evolution of Artificial Intelligence. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI:10.2760/801580, JRC120469

Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers is explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S.K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

George, R. (2020). The use of Artificial Intelligence in the audiovisual sector. Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies. https://bit.ly/2EBMd1a

Herman, D. (2022). The end of high-school English. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/openai-chatgpt-writing-high school-english-essay/672412/

Ibrahim, A., & Saleh. B. A. (2020). Schooling process: Is schooling experience and its outcomethe same for girls and boys? Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science (RISS) Journal, 1(2),126-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v1i2.80

Ibrahim, A. (2014). The students’ perception of teachers’ classroom effectiveness on their self-concepts in Lagos metropolis. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(1), 133-141. http://journals.uob.edu.bh. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12785/jtte/020209

Luckin, R. (2017). Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems. National Human Behaviour, 1(1), 1-28.

Martínez-Plumed, F., Caballero, F., Castellano-Falcón, D., Fernández-Llorca, D., Gómez, E., Hupont-Torres, I., Merino, L., Monserrat, C., & Hernández-Orallo, J., (2020). AI watch: Revisiting technology readiness levels for relevant Artificial Intelligence technologies. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI:10.2760/495140, JRC129399

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 342-363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education Limited.

Ruth, M., Birke, A., & Kaspar, K. (2022). Teaching with digital games: How intentions to adopt digital game-based learning are related to personal characteristics of pre- service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1412–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13201

Sanusi, I.T., Ayanwale, M.A., & Tolorunleke, A.E. (2024). Investigating pre-service teachers’ artificial intelligence perception from the perspective of planned behavior theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100202

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 31-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

Tuomi, I. (2020). The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education. https://doi.org/10.2760/12297.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

Wohlwill, J. F. (2017). The physical environment: A problem for a psychology of stimulation. In K. Doyle Jr. (Eds.), Interaction: Readings in human psychology (pp. 174-188). Health and Company.

Xu, L. D., Lu, Y., & Li, L. (2021). Embedding blockchain technology into IoT for security: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(13), 10452–10473. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3060508

Yeadon, W., Inyang, O. O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. (2022). The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution. Preprint.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-07

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A.-W., Taura, A. A., Iliyasu, A., Shogbesan, Y. O., & Lukman, S. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Perception and Utilization of AI Technologies in Educational Assessment in Nigerian Universities. Edukasiana: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 3(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v3i3.763

Issue

Section

Articles