Enhancing Creative Thinking Abilities and Mathematical Thinking Dispositions in Elementary Students

Authors

  • Samsudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Wahyudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Andika Arisetyawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1706

Keywords:

Creative Thinking Skills, Mathematical Thinking Disposition, Quasi-experiment, Elementary School Students

Abstract

Creative thinking abilities and mathematical thinking dispositions represent critical competencies in elementary mathematics education, yet limited research examines their simultaneous development through targeted pedagogical interventions. This study investigated differences in creative thinking abilities and mathematical thinking dispositions between elementary students receiving differentiated instructional treatments. A quasi-experimental design with non-equivalent control groups was employed, involving 60 fifth-grade students from SD Negeri Sentul 1, divided into experimental (n=30) and control (n=30) groups. Creative thinking ability was measured using an essay test based on Guilford's four-dimensional framework (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration), while mathematical thinking disposition was assessed through a four-point Likert scale questionnaire encompassing curiosity, perseverance, open-mindedness, self-confidence, and reflectivity. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests following normality and homogeneity assumption testing. Significant differences emerged between groups across all measured constructs (p<0.05). The experimental group demonstrated superior creative thinking ability (M=82.6 vs. M=73.9, Cohen's d=1.18) and more positive mathematical thinking disposition (M=3.42 vs. M=2.94, Cohen's d=1.06). Elaboration showed the largest creative thinking difference (9.6 points), while open-mindedness exhibited the greatest dispositional improvement (0.53 points). Findings provide empirical evidence that targeted instructional approaches can simultaneously enhance cognitive abilities and affective dispositions in mathematics learning. The synergistic relationship between creative thinking and positive dispositions challenges traditional pedagogical models that address these dimensions separately. Results support implementing learning environments that encourage exploration, multiple solution strategies, and reflective practices to develop both mathematical competencies and positive attitudes toward mathematics in elementary education.

References

Abraham, A., & Windmann, S. (2007). Creative cognition: The diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods, 42(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.007

Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International journal of human and social sciences, 3(1), 18-23.

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(2), 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004

Benedek, M., & Fink, A. (2019). Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: The role of memory, attention, and cognitive control. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 27, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.11.002

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007

Berry, R. Q., III, Thunder, K., & McClain, O. L. (2011). Counter narratives: Examining the mathematics and racial identities of Black boys who are successful with school mathematics. Journal of African American Males in Education, 2(1), 10–23. https://bma.issuelab.org/resources/22930/22930.pdf

Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2011). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In A. J. Bishop, E. Yackel, K. Gravemeijer, & A. Sfard (Eds.), Mathematics education library: A journey in mathematics education research: Insights from the work of Paul Cobb (Vol. 48, pp. 179–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-9729-3

Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?. Roeper review, 23(2), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069

Dewi, R., & Nugraheni, R. A. (2019). Disposisi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpm.131.05

Dreu, C. K. D., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610381789

Gabriel, F., Signolet, J., & Westwell, M. (2018). A machine learning approach to investigating the effects of mathematics dispositions on mathematical literacy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 306-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1301916

Gray, K., Anderson, S., Chen, E. E., Kelly, J. M., Christian, M. S., Patrick, J., ... & Lewis, K. (2019). “Forward flow”: A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity. American Psychologist, 74(5), 539. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/amp0000391

Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025764

Guilford, P. (1986). Creative Talents: Their Nature, Uses and Development. Buffalo, NY: Bearly Limited.

Hakim, A. L., & Puspita, R. (2021). Desain penelitian kuasi eksperimen dalam pendidikan matematika. Jurnal Metodologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.24127/jmp.v6i2.2135

Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.191

Jauk, E., Eberhardt, L., Koschmieder, C., Diedrich, J., Pretsch, J., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2019). A new measure for the assessment of Appreciation for Creative Personality. Creativity Research Journal, 31(2), 149-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1606622

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

Kenett, Y. N., Levy, O., Kenett, D. Y., Stanley, H. E., Faust, M., & Havlin, S. (2018). Flexibility of thought in high creative individuals represented by percolation analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(5), 867-872. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717362115

Khalil, R., Godde, B., & Karim, A. A. (2019). The link between creativity, cognition, and creative drives and underlying neural mechanisms. Frontiers in neural circuits, 13, 18.

LeBoutillier, N., & Marks, D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: A meta‐analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842084

Leonard, J., & Martin, D. B. (Eds.). (2013). The brilliance of Black children in mathematics: Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse. Information Age.

Martin, D. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth. Erlbaum Associates

McGee, E. O. (2013). Growing up black and brilliant: Narratives of two mathematically high- achieving college students. In J. Leonard & D. B. Martin (Eds.), The brilliance of Black children in mathematics: Beyond the numbers and toward new discourse (pp. 247–272). Information Age. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034845

Munandar, U. (2020). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002

Putri, S. A., & Fitria, R. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar, 5(3), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.26740/jipd.v5n3.p112-120

Sari, D. N., & Mustika, R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 7(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpdn.v7i2.21101

Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.). (1995). The creative cognition approach. MIT press.

Spencer, J. A. (2010). Identity at the crossroads: Understanding the practices and forces that shape African American success and struggle in mathematics. In D. B. Martin (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children (pp. 201–232). Routledge.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (ed. revisi). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumarmo, U. (2020). Disposisi dan kemampuan matematis: Teori dan praktiknya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpmi.v5i1.34210

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.

Trilling, B., and C. Fadel. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Fransisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

Varelas, M., Martin, D. B., & Kane, J. (2012). Content learning and identity construction (CUC): An interpretive framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development, 55(5–6), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345324

Young, J., & Young, J. L. (2018). We can Achieve if We Receive: Examining the Effects of Out-of-School Time Activities on Black Student Achievement in Mathematics. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10665684.2018.1506952

Young, J., Young, J., & Witherspoon, T. (2019). Informing Informal STEM Learning: Implications for Mathematics Identity in African American Students. Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(1), 39–56. http://educationforatoz.com/ images/2019-1-3-Young_et_al_LM_AS_Final.pdf

Yuliani, N., Hidayat, R., & Nuraini, L. (2022). Hubungan antara disposisi dan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa sekolah dasar. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v6i1.4978

Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 136. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017379

Downloads

Published

2025-08-18

How to Cite

Samsudin, S., Wahyudin, W., & Arisetyawan, A. (2025). Enhancing Creative Thinking Abilities and Mathematical Thinking Dispositions in Elementary Students. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(3), 1787–1796. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1706

Issue

Section

Articles