Visual-Enhanced Discovery Learning: An Action Research Study on Improving Natural and Social Sciences Learning Outcomes in Elementary Education

Authors

  • Putri Amelia Universitas Tadulako
  • Sinta Satria Dewi Pendit Universitas Tadulako
  • Surahman Wilade Universitas Tadulako
  • Arif Firmansyah Universitas Tadulako
  • Andi Nur Isnayanti Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2383

Keywords:

Discovery Learning, Image Media, IPAS Education, Elementary School, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

Learning outcomes in Natural and Social Sciences (IPAS) among elementary students remain suboptimal due to traditional teacher-centered approaches that limit active engagement and conceptual understanding. This study investigated the effectiveness of discovery learning models assisted by image media in improving fourth-grade IPAS learning outcomes. A classroom action research design following Kemmis and McTaggart's cyclical model was implemented over two cycles at SDN 8 Mamboro with 29 fourth-grade students. Data collection employed achievement tests validated by experts (content validity ratio = 0.85, Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and structured observations. Each cycle comprised planning, action, observation, and reflection phases, with discovery learning activities supported by curriculum-aligned image media. The intervention demonstrated progressive improvements across cycles. Pre-intervention baseline showed 42.5% student competency, increasing to 69.0% in Cycle I and achieving 100% competency in Cycle II. Classical absorption rates improved from 42.5% baseline to 61.75% in Cycle I and 90.75% in Cycle II. Student engagement levels increased from 75% to 88.75%, while teacher effectiveness scores improved from 83.75% to 90%. All students achieved minimum competency standards by the final cycle, with scores ranging from 75-100. The findings validate constructivist learning principles and demonstrate the synergistic effects of combining discovery learning with visual media. Results align with previous research on student-centered approaches while extending understanding of multimedia integration in elementary science education. The dramatic improvement from passive to active learning confirms the effectiveness of this pedagogical combination in addressing contemporary educational challenges and supporting diverse learning styles in IPAS instruction.

References

Abbott, M. L., & Fouts, J. T. (2003). Constructivist teaching and student achievement: The results of a school-level classroom observation study in Washington. Technical Report. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED481694

Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 191-208). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9

Amin, S., Madjdi, A. H., Ardianti, S. D., & Gung, Y. T. (2021). The effect of discovery learning on science learning achievements for elementary school students. Asian Pendidikan, 1(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v1i2.9.2021

Astiti, N. K. A., Kristiantari, M. G. R., & Saputra, K. A. (2021). Efektivitas model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan media PowerPoint terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa SD. Journal of Education Action Research, 5(3), 409-415. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JEAR/article/view/36695

Ayaz, M. F., & Sekerci, H. (2015). The effects of the constructivist learning approach on student's academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 143-156. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077612

Azevedo, J. P., Amer, A., Bottan, N. L., Deodat, E., & Horn, D. (2021). The state of the global education crisis: A path to recovery. World Bank Group.

Azizah, I. A., & Mardiana, D. (2024). Learning transformation: Increasing student achievement through discovery learning. Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v2i2.42

Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121

Bhardwaj, V., Zhang, S., Tan, Y. Q., & Pandey, V. (2025, February). Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 10, p. 1518602). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602

Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121

Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers' attempts at integrating engineering in mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3-4), 93-104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1168824

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176665

Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x

Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C. P., & Davis, M. E. (2018). Engineering concepts, practices, and trajectories for early childhood education. In L. English & T. Moore (Eds.), Early childhood education and engineering (pp. 135-174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_8

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED606743

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203986561/new-meaning-educational-change-michael-fullan

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-18831-000

Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8

Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 234-259). Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0013

Inde, K. H., Kaleka, M. B., & Ilyas, I. (2020). The effect of discovery learning model on learning outcome of grade-VII students of SMPN 5 Nangapanda. Journal of Science Education Research, 4(1), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.21831/jser.v4i1.34233

Istidah, A., Suherman, U., & Holik, A. (2022). Peningkatan hasil belajar IPA tentang materi sifat-sifat cahaya melalui metode discovery learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian, dan Inovasi, 2(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.59818/jpi.v2i1.187

Krajcik, J. (2015). Three-dimensional instruction: Using a new type of teaching in the science classroom. School Science Review, 97(358), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc15_053_03_6

Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482

Moore, T. J., Johnson, C. C., Peters-Burton, E. E., & Guzey, S. S. (2015). The need for a STEM road map. In STEM road map (pp. 3-12). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315753157-3/need-stem-road-map-tamara-moore-carla-johnson-erin-peters-burton-selcen-guzey

Pérez Echeverría, M. D. P. P., Postigo, Y., & Pecharromán, A. (2009). Graphicacy: University students’ skills in translating information. In Representational systems and practices as learning tools (pp. 209-224). Brill Sense. https://brill.com/display/title/37472#page=219

Resmawati, F. S., Prabowo, P., & Munasir, M. (2018, July). The discovery learning model with a scientific approach to increase science learning achievement of students. In Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2018) (pp. 198-200). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/miseic-18.2018.48

Rikmasari, R., & Rosesa, S. (2022). Model pembelajaran discovery learning sebagai solusi untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar pada mata pelajaran IPA siswa sekolah dasar. Pedagogik: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.33558/pedagogik.v10i1.4606

Samputri, S. (2020). Science process skills and cognitive learning outcomes through discovery learning models. European Journal of Education Studies, 7(1), 81-95. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/2871

Sasingan, M., & Wote, A. Y. V. (2022). Penggunaan model discovery learning dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPA. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(1), 42-47. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JLLS/article/view/40604

Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8

Siahaan, F. E., & Sihotang, C. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SMP Satrya Budi Perdagangan. Jurnal Simki Pedagogia, 6(1), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.29407/jsp.v6i1.233

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205

Utley, J., Ivey, T., Hammack, R., & High, K. (2019). Enhancing engineering education in the elementary school. School science and mathematics, 119(4), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12332

Windschitl, M., & Stroupe, D. (2017). The three-story challenge: Implications of the Next Generation Science Standards for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117696278

Yulistiawati, N., Khoimatun, K., & Fatkhiyani, K. (2022). Peningkatan hasil belajar IPA dengan menggunakan model discovery learning pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(2), 578-583. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.2081

Downloads

Published

2025-10-26

How to Cite

Amelia, P., Pendit, S. S. D., Wilade, S., Firmansyah, A., & Isnayanti, A. N. (2025). Visual-Enhanced Discovery Learning: An Action Research Study on Improving Natural and Social Sciences Learning Outcomes in Elementary Education. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(4), 3346–3355. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v4i4.2383

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>