Enhancing Academic Competitiveness Through Strategic Curriculum Development Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2777Keywords:
Academic competitiveness, curriculum development, university entrance examinations, educational quality, secondary educationAbstract
Gaining entry into state universities through competitive selection mechanisms requires systematic academic preparation beyond individual aptitude, necessitating effective curriculum development management. However, misalignment between competency-based curriculum implementation and examination-focused selection requirements poses significant challenges for secondary schools. This qualitative case study examined curriculum development management at SMAN 1 Singaparna and SMAN 2 Singaparna using semi-structured interviews, systematic observations, and document analysis. Data were analyzed through Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña's interactive model involving data condensation, display, and conclusion drawing. Both institutions implemented systematic curriculum management through collaborative planning involving multiple stakeholders, coordinated organizational structures with clear role distribution, adaptive implementation integrating HOTS-based instruction with examination preparation, and multidimensional evaluation frameworks. Strategic responses to challenges included developing internal resource banks, establishing partnerships with online learning platforms, implementing alumni mentoring programs, and scheduling intensive preparation during post-examination periods. Despite infrastructure limitations, uneven teacher capacity, temporal constraints, and policy instability, both schools demonstrated organizational innovation and teacher agency in balancing comprehensive education with competitive examination preparation. Findings demonstrate that curriculum-assessment misalignment can be addressed through strategic integration at planning and implementation stages, extending curriculum management theory to competitive contexts and providing actionable insights for educational administrators navigating similar challenges while maintaining educational integrity.
References
Alvarado, J., & Galigao, R. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Curriculum Implementation Across Global Educational Systems. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for Innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence (IMJRISE), 1(11), 219-228. https://risejournals.org/index.php/imjrise/article/view/851
Amyus, R. S., Hamami, A. R., Nurhasanah, N., & Mudasir, M. (2024). Manajemen Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 8(3), 48324–48332. Retrieved from https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/23284
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ansoff, H. I. (1975). Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review, 18(2), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164635
Aydin, U., & Birgili, B. (2023). Assessing mathematical higher-order thinking skills: An analysis of Turkish University entrance examinations. Educational Assessment, 28(3), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2202311
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bound, J., Hershbein, B., & Long, B. T. (2009). Playing the admissions game: Student reactions to increasing college competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(4), 119-146. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.4.119
Bryk, A. S., Gomez, L. M., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. G. (2015). Learning to improve: How America's schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.
Bull, D. A. (2025). Impact of curriculum misalignment and assessment practices on student learning outcomes in higher education: A PRISMA-guided qualitative content synthesis. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovations, 13(3), 65-87.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Effectiveness of curriculum change in school: An organizational perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 8(3), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513549410062416
Cook, B. J., & Turner, C. (2019). Access to higher education entrance examinations: Global trends and equity considerations. Educational Testing Service.
Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2018). Professional collaboration with purpose: Teacher learning towards equitable and excellent schools. Routledge.
Davey, G., De Lian, C., & Higgins, L. (2007). The university entrance examination system in China. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(4), 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770701625761
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
Govindasamy, V., & Mestry, R. (2022). The principal’s role in managing curriculum change: Implications for the provision of quality education. South African journal of education, 42(4), 1-10. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-educat_v42_n4_a7
Hamalik, O. (2019). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.
Khan, R. A., Spruijt, A., Mahboob, U., & van Merrienboer, J. J. (2019). Determining ‘curriculum viability’through standards and inhibitors of curriculum quality: a scoping review. BMC medical education, 19(1), 336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1759-8
King, F. J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2011). Higher order thinking skills: Definitions, strategies, assessment. Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment.
Kuramoto, N., & Koizumi, R. (2018). Current issues in large-scale educational assessment in Japan: Focus on national assessment of academic ability and university entrance examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(4), 415-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1225667
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.91
Luwihta, A. D., & Fianti, A. W. F. (2023). Manajemen Peserta Didik dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing di Madrasah. AKSI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.37348/aksi.v1i2.246
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
Park, S. (2024). Does the relationship between competitiveness and student achievement vary based on the culture of competitiveness? Evidence from PISA 2018. International Journal of Educational Research, 127, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102438
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking: The art of Socratic questioning. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(1), 36-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ832681
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic.
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007). The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning. Instructional Science, 35(6), 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Sanga, L. D., & Wangdra, Y. (2023). Pendidikan Adalah Faktor Penentu Daya Saing Bangsa. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Social Sciences & Technology, 84-90. https://doi.org/10.33884/psnistek.v5i.8067
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Rand McNally.
Setiawan, F., Gio, M., Iza, S. N., & T, H. A. (2022). Manajemen Sekolah sebagai Wadah dalam Peningkatan Pendidikan Bermutu. ARZUSIN, 2(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v2i1.235
Shastry, G. K. (2012). Human capital response to globalization: Education and information technology in India. Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 287-330. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.47.2.287
Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of education: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D.. Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Pengembangan kurikulum: Teori dan praktik. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suryadi, F., Pasaribu, M. H., Siahaan, A. D., Sabri, A., & Lubis, Y. (2024). Peran Manajemen Pendidikan dalam Mewujudkan Sekolah Berkualitas. Inspirasi Dunia: Journal of Education and Language Research, 3(4), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.58192/insdun.v3i4.2617
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Yurkofsky, M. M., Peterson, A. J., Mehta, J. D., Horwitz-Willis, R., & Frumin, K. M. (2020). Research on continuous improvement: Exploring the complexities of managing educational change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403-433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165-184). Academic Press.
Zhao, L., Zhao, B., & Li, C. (2023). Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: how teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rinrin Suryaningsih, Lilis Suwandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
