Quality Management of Principal Academic Supervision for Enhancing Teacher Pedagogical Competence
A Comparative Case Study of Two Indonesian Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2779Keywords:
Pedagogical competence, quality management, academic supervisionAbstract
Teacher pedagogical competence remains critical for educational quality, yet many teachers struggle with planning, implementing, and evaluating instruction effectively. Academic supervision represents a vital quality management mechanism, though limited research examines how principals systematically integrate quality management principles into supervision practices. This study investigated quality management approaches to principal academic supervision in enhancing teacher pedagogical competence through comparative analysis of two elementary schools. A qualitative multiple case study design was employed at SDN 164 Karangpawulang and SDN 033 Asmi Bandung. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 12 participants (principals, vice principals, teachers), classroom observations, and document analysis. Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's framework was conducted to identify patterns across planning, implementation, evaluation, and follow-up stages. Both schools successfully implemented systematic supervision cycles aligned with quality management principles, though employing distinct approaches. SDN 164 emphasized standardized instruments from the Merdeka Mengajar Platform and Employee Performance Target integration, while SDN 033 excelled in collaborative supervision incorporating lesson study principles and reflective practices. Teachers demonstrated significant improvements in pedagogical competencies, translating into enhanced student engagement and learning outcomes. Effective supervision quality management requires balancing standardization with contextualization, evaluation with professional growth. The study advances theoretical integration of instructional leadership, quality management, and collaborative learning frameworks while offering actionable strategies for practitioners.
References
Arsini, Y., Yoana, L., & Prastami, Y. (2023). Peranan Guru Sebagai Model dalam Pembentukan Karakter Peserta Didik. MUDABBIR Journal Research and Education Studies, 3(2), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.56832/mudabbir.v3i2.368
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J. E., & Shavelson, R. J. (2016). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
Bold, T., Filmer, D., Martin, G., Molina, E., Stacy, B., Rockmore, C., ... & Wane, W. (2017). Enrollment without learning: Teacher effort, knowledge, and skill in primary schools in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.185
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cahyana, C., & Agustin, M. (2024). Kompetensi pedagogik guru kelas: perencanaan, penerapan dan evaluasi dalam pembelajaran. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 844-851. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5962
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.
Dudley, P. (2014). Lesson study: A handbook. http://lessonstudy.co.uk/lesson-study-a-handbook/
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O'Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools—Describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
Fakhruddin, A. M., Annisa, Putri, L. O., & Sudirman, P. R. A. T. (2023). Kompetensi Seorang Guru dalam Mengajar. Journal on Education, 5(2), 3418–3425. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i2.1021
Gaol, N. T. L., & Siburian, P. (2018). Peran Kepala Sekolah Dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2018.v5.i1.p66-73
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2007). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hallinger, P., & Wang, W. C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. Springer.
Hannum, I. (2021). Supervisi Akademik Sebagai Upaya Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti (PAIBP) Sekolah Dasar Di Kota Binjai. Jurnal Analisa Pemikiran Insan Cendikia (Jurnal APIC), 4(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.24114/esjpgsd.v10i4.23706
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Hoque, K. E., Kenayathulla, H. B., Subramaniam, M. V., & Islam, R. (2020). Relationships between supervision and teachers' performance and attitude in secondary schools in Malaysia. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020925501
Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1034865
Houston, D. (2007). TQM and higher education: A critical systems perspective on fitness for purpose. Quality in Higher Education, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320701272672
König, J., Doll, J., Buchholtz, N., Förster, S., Kaspar, K., Rühl, A. M., Strauß, S., Bremerich-Vos, A., Fladung, I., & Kaiser, G. (2020). General pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical adaptivity in written lesson plans, and instructional practice among preservice teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1752804
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
Mardalena, M., Arafat, Y., & Fitria, H. (2020). Pengaruh Supervisi Akademik dan Kompetensi Profesional Guru terhadap Kinerja Guru di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri di Kecamatan Tanjung Raja. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains, 9(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v9i1.5582
Mariscal, L. L., Albarracin, M. R., Mobo, F. D., & Cutillas, A. L. (2023). Pedagogical Competence towards Technology-Driven Instruction on Basic Education. Online Submission, 4(5), 1567-1580. http://dx.doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.18
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Muhsin, Sudadi, Mahmud, M. E., & Muadin, A. (2023). Supervisi Akademik untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Budaya Mutu. Journal of Education Research, 4(4), 2393–2398. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v4i4.569
Murdock, J., Kamischke, E., Seeley, C., & Whitenack, J. W. (2020). Effective planning for powerful teaching. NCTM.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
O'Neill, O. (2013). Intelligent accountability in education. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.764761
Osakwe, R. N. (2014). Classroom management: A tool for achieving quality secondary school education in Nigeria. International Journal of Education, 6(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v6i2.5616
Ozen, H., & Yıldırım, R. (2020). Teacher perspectives on classroom management. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.645818
Popova, A., Evans, D. K., Breeding, M. E., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher professional development around the world: The gap between evidence and practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Sanjani, M. A. (2020). Tugas Dan Peranan Guru Dalam Proses Peningkatan Belajar Mengajar. Jurnal Serunai Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v6i1.287
Scheerens, J. (2016). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness: A critical review of the knowledge base. Springer.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Sihaloho, B. (2022). School principal leadership in realizing independent learning at SMK Negeri 1 Patumbak. Jurnal Guru Kita PGSD, 6(2), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.24114/jgk.v6i2.32547
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy: Relations and consequences. In T. McIntyre, S. McIntyre, & D. Francis (Eds.), Educator stress (pp. 101–125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53053-6_5
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. UNESCO Publishing.
Wahidah, A., Amrulloh, A., & Hakim, D. (2024). Peran supervisi akademik kepala sekolah dalam optimalisasi implementasi kurikulum merdeka di sekolah. Nidhomiyyah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.38073/nidhomiyyah.v5i2.1851
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
World Bank. (2024). Closing the learning data gap: The state of education data and assessment systems. World Bank.
Yestiani, D. K., & Zahwa, N. (2020). Peran Guru dalam Pembelajaran pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Fondatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.515
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muthi Fadhilah, Eva Dianawati Wasliman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
