Collaborative Leadership Practices and Their Impact on Educational Quality Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2868Keywords:
collaborative leadership, educational quality management, rural elementary school, professional learning communities, distributed leadershipAbstract
Collaborative leadership has emerged as a critical approach for enhancing educational quality management, yet its implementation in resource-constrained rural schools remains underexplored. This qualitative descriptive study examined collaborative principal leadership and its role in implementing educational quality management at SD Inpres 3 Tolai, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with the principal and nine teachers, document analysis, and structured questionnaires, then analyzed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Findings revealed that collaborative leadership achieved 90.2% effectiveness, characterized by participatory decision-making, professional empowerment, trust-building, and institutionalization of Professional Learning Communities. Six major themes emerged: participatory decision-making, empowerment and professional development, trust-building and democratic climate, Professional Learning Communities, adaptive leadership in the digital era, and implementation challenges including time constraints and resource limitations. Teachers unanimously perceived the principal's leadership as highly collaborative, with 59.4% strongly agreeing and 40.6% agreeing across all measured dimensions. The study demonstrates that collaborative leadership can function effectively in resource-constrained contexts by leveraging relational capital—trust, communication, and shared commitment—to compensate for material limitations. Findings support Collaborative Leadership Theory and Total Quality Management principles, illustrating how distributed decision-making fosters continuous improvement and democratic organizational culture. The research contributes evidence-based insights for strengthening educational leadership capacity in rural Indonesian elementary schools.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Barrett, A., Sajid, A., Clegg, J., Hinostroza, J. E., Lowe, J., Nikel, J., Novelli, M., Oduro, G., Pillay, M., Tikly, L., & Yu, G. (2019). Initiatives to improve the quality of teaching and learning in Sub-Saharan Africa (UNESCO IIEP Working Papers No. 10). UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Bektaş, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Gümüş, S. (2022). The effects of distributed leadership on teacher professional learning: Mediating roles of teacher trust in principal and teacher motivation. Educational Studies, 48(5), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793301
Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. Jossey-Bass.
Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Demirel, M. (2009). Lifelong learning and schools in the twenty-first century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.303
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine Transaction.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business Press.
Hairon, S., & Goh, J. W. P. (2020). Pursuing the elusive construct of distributed leadership: Is the search over? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214535745
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213497635
Karadag, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students' achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1
Kemendikbudristek. (2023). Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar: Inovasi untuk kemajuan pendidikan Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Khalifah, H., Santosa, H., Listyasari, W. D., Takdir, M., & Syam, A. R. (2025). Kepemimpinan Agile Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Sekolah di Daerah Terpencil: Analisis Systematic Literature Review. Prosiding Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta, 3(1), 229-239. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/semnas-ps/article/view/63638
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2018). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023
Liu, Y., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Gümüş, S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
Longworth, N. (2003). Lifelong learning in action: Transforming education in the 21st century. Routledge.
Lüftenegger, M., Finsterwald, M., Klug, J., Bergsmann, E., van de Schoot, R., Schober, B., & Wagner, P. (2019). Fostering pupils’ lifelong learning competencies in the classroom: evaluation of a training programme using a multivariate multilevel growth curve approach. In Bildung Psychology (pp. 94-111). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203701140
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
OECD. (2019). Working and learning together: Rethinking human resource policies for schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b7aaf050-en
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Sagnak, M. (2012). The empowering leadership and teachers' innovative behavior: The mediating role of innovation climate. African Journal of Business Management, 6(4), 1635–1641. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2162
Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Scheerens, J. (2017). School leadership effects revisited: Review and meta-analysis of empirical studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2768-7
Sipple, J. W., & Brent, B. O. (2015). Challenges and strategies associated with rural school settings. In H. F. Ladd & M. E. Goertz (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 612–631). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961063
Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: An investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02383003
Spillane, J. P. (2020). Distributed leadership (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Sudrajat, D. (2022). Mutu Pendidikan Pada Sekolah Dasar Standar Nasional di Tenggarong. Intelegensia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(2), 71-86. https://intelegensia.web.id/index.php/intelegensia/article/view/147
Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2022). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing.
Yang, X., & Chang, Y. C. (2024). The effects of perceived distributed leadership on teacher professional development among primary school teachers: The mediating role of teacher professional learning community. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202429304
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Febi Yulianti, Rizal, Pahriadi, Muhammad Aqil, Surahman Wilade, Sisriawan Lapasere
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
