Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Visualisasi Materi Matematika melalui Papan Tulis Digital (Canva) dan Konvensional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/jp.v4i3.2263Abstract
This study aims to describe the perceptions of mathematics education students regarding the use of the Canva whiteboard and a conventional whiteboard in mathematics learning. This research is driven by the necessity to employ digital media in remote learning and limited classroom space, as well as the goal to evaluate the effectiveness of digital media compared to conventional methods. There were 29 participants, 13 males and 16 females, all from the 2nd, 4th and 6th semesters. The subjects were selected using a total sampling technique, involving all active students of the Mathematics Education Study Program at STKIP Tanjungpura in the even semester of the 2024/2025 academic year. The quantitative descriptive approach with within-subjects design was used since all respondents participated in learning with both media. The instrument was a 15-item Likert scale questionnaire covering seven indicators: clarity of explanation, visualization of abstract concepts, focus and concentration, interaction and discussion, ease of note-taking, re-access of materials, and overall understanding. Analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and paired t-test. The findings indicated that Canva whiteboard was significantly superior in re-access materials as well as ease of note-taking, while the conventional whiteboard was significantly superior in interaction and discussion. Other indicators did not show significant differences. These findings suggest the implementation of a blended media approach, specifically combining Canva and conventional to strengthen visualization and accessibility.
References
Ainsworth, S. (2018). Multiple representations and multimedia learning. International Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572
Campbell, M., Detres, M., & Lucio, R. (2019). Can a digital whiteboard foster student engagement? Social Work Education, 38(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02615479.2018.1556631
Campbell, M., Lucio, R., & Detres, M. (2018). Digital Whiteboards: a Technology To Foster Student Engagement. INTED2018 Proceedings, 1(July), 2091–2095. https://doi.org/ 10.21125/inted.2018.0391
Dontre, A. J. (2021). The influence of technology on academic distraction: A review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.229
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. CV. Pustaka Ilmu Group Yogyakarta.
Hassanuddin, N. A., Yusoff, S., & Noh, N. H. (2022). The Use of Interactive Whiteboard in Teaching Mathematics and Statistics. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 4(3), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2022.4.3.8
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Mendez, A., Brioso, J., Jaramillo, A., Premawardena, D., Cunningham, E., Sarran-Armogan, L., & Zhou, C. (2022). Use of Digital Whiteboard to Engage Undergraduates in Online Studies of Instructor-Generated Biological Diagrams. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00195-21
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Candra, T. D., Susiswo, & As’ari, A. R. (2018). Exploring the explanation of pre-service teacher in mathematics teaching practice. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5388.259-270
Northcote, M., Mildenhall, P., Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2010). Interactive whiteboards: Interactive or just whiteboards? [Special issue]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 494–510. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/northcote.pdf
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. In Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press.
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144(September 2019), 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Reguera, E. A. M., & Lopez, M. (2021). Using a digital whiteboard for student engagement in distance education. Computers and Electrical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compeleceng.2021.107268
Serin, H. (2017). The Effects of Interactive Whiteboard on Teaching Geometry. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 4(3), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v4i3p216
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Rahmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.