Kajian Ontologi Integrasi Google Lens dalam Pembelajaran LHO: Analisis Hakikat Teknologi dan Reposisi Peran Guru dalam Proses Konstruksi Pengetahuan Ilmiah Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/ejip.v5i1.2982Keywords:
Ontologi, Kecerdasan Buatan, Google Lens, Laporan Hasil Observasi, Konstruksi Pengetahuan, Reposisi GuruAbstract
Integrasi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI), khususnya Google Lens, dalam pembelajaran Laporan Hasil Observasi (LHO) menimbulkan pertanyaan fundamental tentang hakikat teknologi, transformasi konstruksi pengetahuan, dan reposisi peran guru. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif filosofis dengan desain studi literatur sistematis, menganalisis korpus literatur filosofi ontologi, teori pembelajaran konstruktivis, dan penelitian tentang integrasi AI dalam pendidikan (1970-2025). Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif-interpretatif menggunakan kerangka ontologi dengan triangulasi teoretis dan sumber untuk menjaga validitas. Temuan mengungkapkan tiga dimensi fundamental: (1) Google Lens memiliki quasi-agensi yang mengubah relasi subjek-objek menjadi triadik, menciptakan hermeneutic relation; (2) integrasi teknologi mentransformasi konstruksi pengetahuan menjadi konsumsi informasi dengan risiko simulacrum of knowledge; (3) guru dituntut reposisi ontologis dari transmitter pengetahuan menjadi fasilitator kritis dalam lima dimensi: epistemik, psikologis, metakognitif, etnografis, dan epistemologis. Penelitian ini mengembangkan ontological framework yang melengkapi perspektif instrumental-pedagogis dalam literatur existing, memberikan kontribusi konseptual tentang hakikat teknologi AI dan implikasi praktis untuk integrasi teknologi yang memperkuat proses konstruksi pengetahuan autentik.
References
Ahmadi, A. (2019). Teachers as psychologist: Experience in beginner level of creative writing classes using behavior modification. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(12), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.12.7
Ahmadi, A. (2021a). Teachers as ethnographers: Narrative study of inquiry of Indonesian teachers assigned to teach in remote areas. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.115
Ahmadi, A. (2021b). Teaching creative (literary) writing: Indigenous psychological perspective. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 16(4), 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i4.5997
Baviskar, S. N., Hartle, R. T., & Whitney, T. (2009). Essential criteria to characterize constructivist teaching: Derived from a review of the literature and applied to five constructivist-teaching method articles. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 541-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701731121
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The psychology of written composition. Routledge.
Blikstad-Balas, M., Roe, A., & Klette, K. (2018). Opportunities to write: An exploration of student writing during language arts lessons in Norwegian lower secondary classrooms. Written Communication, 35(2), 119-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317751123
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two decades of artificial intelligence in education. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 28-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48647028
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). What is successful writing? An investigation into the multiple ways writers can write successful essays. Written Communication, 31(2), 184-214. hhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314526354
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277-303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
Martinez, C. T., Kock, N., & Cass, J. (2011). Pain and pleasure in short essay writing: Factors predicting university students' writing anxiety and self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 54(5), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.5.5
Matthews, B. (2024). Finding the human in an era of machine intelligence: A flat ontological analysis of generative AI and language learning. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1612
Ng, D. T. K., Lee, M., Tan, R. J. Y., Hu, X., Downie, J. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8445-8501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11491-w
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology (E. Duckworth, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.
Salovey, P., & Haar, M. D. (1990). The efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy and writing process training for alleviating writing anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 513-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172971
Shapovalov, V. B., Shapovalov, Y. B., Bilyk, Z. I., Megalinska, A. P., & Muzyka, I. O. (2019). The Google Lens analyzing quality: An analysis of the possibility to use in the educational process. Educational Dimension, 53(1), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.31812/educdim.v53i1.3844
Ummah, M. N., Siswanto, W., & Andajani, K. (2025). Implikasi Etika Keilmuan dalam Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence (AI) pada Keterampilan Menulis Karya Ilmiah Siswa Kelas XI MAN 2 Mojokerto. Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 14(1). https://jurnal.umt.ac.id/index.php/lgrm/article/view/13078
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Xu, W. (2020). Toward human-centered AI: A perspective from human-computer interaction. Interactions, 27(4), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328485
Zhao, Y., & Jensen, H. (2022). Towards a Modern Learning Organization: Human-Centered Digitalization of Lessons Learned Management for Complex Systems Development Projects. Technologies, 10(6), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies10060117
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indrayane Kholiem, Suhartono, Anas Ahmadi, Resdi Permata Raharjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
