Bridging the Gap: Integrating Sustainability-as-Practice in Japanese Business English Education

Authors

  • Travis Past Kyoto Sangyo University
  • Michael D. Smith Kobe University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v3i2.2795

Keywords:

Higher Education, Education for Sustainable Development, English for Specific Purposes, Business English, Japan

Abstract

This action research sought to investigate the experiences and positions of Japanese college-level learners relating to sustainability to better embed education for sustainable development within departmental-level practice. Specifically, we analyzed the responses of students enrolled in a fourteen-week Business English course designed to prompt reflections and discussions of sustainability in English as a foreign language. Drawing on idiographic action research, data was collected through written reflections and semi-structured interviews throughout the semester, with final group interviews performed upon course completion. Results indicate significant improvement in students’ capacities to reflect upon and discuss sustainability in English. More pointedly, critical awareness of corporate sustainability measures expanded throughout the course. Global pushes for sustainability extend beyond borders, cultures, and languages. Consequently, education for sustainable development should not be confined solely to native language instruction but integrated into second-and-foreign-language courses. Japan, a nation claiming a policy-level commitment to English education and sustainable development, lags in global assessments of English proficiency and in adopting forward-thinking pedagogical approaches designed to enhance sustainable awareness and action. Due to these insufficiencies, Japan’s capacity to collaborate in sustainability efforts may be constrained. Thus, pedagogical initiatives like those detailed here may work to bridge gaps between policy and practice.

Author Biography

Michael D. Smith, Kobe University

Associate Professor, Kobe University, Graduate School of Intercultural Studies

References

Baskerville, R.L. (1999). Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2, 1–32.

Cosgun, G., & Atay, D. (2021). Fostering critical thinking, creativity, and language skills in the EFL classroom through problem-based learning. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(3), 2360–2385.

Cotton, D., & Winter, J. (2010). It’s not just bits of paper and light bulbs: A review of sustainability pedagogies and their potential for use in higher education. In P. Jones, D. Selby, & S. Sterling (Eds.), Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education (pp. 39–54). London: Earthscan.

de la Fuente, M. J. (2021). Problem-based pedagogy for the advanced college language curriculum: Becoming a multicompetent language user through sustainability education. In Education for Sustainable Development in Foreign Language Learning: Content-based Instruction in College-level Curricula (pp. 65–84). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003080183-6

Didham, R. J., & Ofei-Manu, P. (2012). Education for sustainable development: Country status reports. IGES.

Education First. (2024). EF EPI 2024. Education First. Available at: www.ef.com/wwen/epi/regions/asia/ (accessed 15 August 2025).

Egitim, S. (2021). Collaborative leadership in English language classrooms: Engaging learners in leaderful classroom practices and strategies. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1990413

Elmassah, S., Biltagy, M., & Gamal, D. (2022). Framing the role of higher education in sustainable development: A case study analysis. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2), 320–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-05-2020-0164

Gonglewski, M., & Helm, A.H. (2014). Sustainability pedagogies for the business language classroom. Global Business Languages 19(2), 3–21.

G20 Development Working Group. (2019). G20 initiative on human capital investment for sustainable development. Available at https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/g20_summit/osaka19/pdf/documents/en/annex_10.pdf (accessed 11 July 2023).

Kock, N., Gallivan, M.J., & DeLuca, D. (2008). Furthering information systems action research: a post-positivist synthesis of four dialectics. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(2), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00150

Liu, J. (2023). Initiatives for promoting ESD in Japan and China: Through a comparative lens. Head Foundation. Available at: https://digest.headfoundation.org/2023/06/15/initiatives-for-promoting-esd-in-japan-and-china-through-a-comparative-lens/ (accessed 25 November 2023).

MEXT. (2015). About the period for integrated studies [Sōgōtekinagakushūnojikan ni tsuite] . MEXT. Available at: http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo3/064/siryo/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2016/01/07/1365764_3.pdf (accessed 15 July 2023).

MEXT. (2016). Promotion of SDGs and science and technology innovation. MEXT. Available at: https://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/09/04/1420912_004.pdf (accessed 17 July 2023).

Nagata, Y. (2017). A critical review of education for sustainable development (ESD) in Japan. Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 11, 29–41.

Noon, E. J. (2018). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: An appropriate methodology for educational research? Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 6(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i1.304

Ohagi, A. (2019). Current climate of ESD in Japan. NIER. Available at: https://www.nier.go.jp/English/educationjapan/pdf/20190408-02.pdf (accessed 14 July 2023).

Onuki, M., & Mino, T. (2009). Sustainability education and a new master’s degree, the master of sustainability science: The graduate program in sustainability science (GPSS) at the University of Tokyo. Sustainability Science, 4(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-009-0073-5

Past, T. H., & Smith, M. D. (2023). Towards a ‘leaderful’ sustainable development? An interpretive phenomenological analysis of Japanese education. In S. Egitim & Y. Umemiya (Eds.), Leaderful Classroom Pedagogy Through a Multidisciplinary Lens: Merging Theory with Practice (pp. 195–210). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6655-4_12

Poon, J. (2017). Engaging sustainability good practice within the curriculum design and property portfolio in the Australian higher education sector. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Educaxtion 18(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2015-0149

Roell, C. (2019). Using a case study in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 57(4), 24–33.

Sacco, S.J., Jones, A.M., & Sacco, R.L. (2014). Incorporating global sustainability in the business language curriculum. Global Business Languages 19(3), 23–35.

Smith, J. A. (1999). Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164248

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Smith, M. D. (2023). The case for intercultural hermeneutics? A brief introduction to an interpretative research framework. In P. Clark, K. Ballou, & R. Derrah (Eds.), Proceedings of the Asian Conference for Innovation in Education, 2(1), 1–14.

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.54675/YFRE1448

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Past, T., & Smith, M. D. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Integrating Sustainability-as-Practice in Japanese Business English Education. Journal of Education For Sustainable Innovation, 3(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v3i2.2795

Issue

Section

Articles