Teacher Performance Management in Improving Learning Achievement of Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Ina Yuningsih Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Ida Tejawiani Universitas Islam Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2759

Keywords:

Teacher Performance Management, Learning Achievement, Pedagogical Competence, Case Study

Abstract

Suboptimal teacher performance management implementation contributes to persistent low student achievement in Indonesian elementary education, yet limited research examines how contextual variations shape management effectiveness in resource-constrained rural settings. This qualitative comparative case study investigated teacher performance management across Armstrong's five-stage framework (planning, implementation, monitoring, assessment, follow-up) at two elementary schools in Naringgul District, Cianjur Regency. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with principals, teachers, and students; participatory classroom observations; and document analysis, then analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña's interactive model. Both schools implemented all performance management stages systematically, though with distinct approaches: SDN Mulyasari employed backward design planning and spontaneous differentiated instruction despite infrastructure limitations, achieving 65% student competency attainment, while SDN Tegallame utilized behavioral objectives planning and programmatic differentiation with superior technology integration, achieving 75% attainment. The study revealed effective monitoring requires "nested feedback loops" combining classroom-level formative assessment with school-level clinical supervision. However, a critical implementation gap emerged: weak linkage between performance evaluation outcomes and targeted professional development interventions in both schools. Findings demonstrate that effective performance management permits multiple valid instantiations shaped by context, with pedagogical adaptability partially compensating for resource constraints. The research advances theoretical understanding by conceptualizing monitoring as synergistic multilevel systems while identifying the evaluation-to-development gap as a key barrier to transformative impact, suggesting educational leaders must prioritize systemic integration and establish explicit pathways connecting assessment to focused professional learning.

References

Abdullah, Y. (2020). Implementasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Dalam Kegiatan Supervisi Pembelajaran di SDN 04 Duhiadaa. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.30603/tjmpi.v8i2.1294

Abrha, T. G., & Weldeyohans, B. T. (2025). The role of human capital in economic development: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20251302.11

Aguinis, H. (2009). Performance management (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.

Akyeampong, K., Lussier, K., Pryor, J., & Westbrook, J. (2013). Improving teaching and learning of basic maths and reading in Africa: Does teacher preparation count? International Journal of Educational Development, 33(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.006

Alshaikhi, N., & Alshaikhi, T. (2021). An assessment of teachers' performance management system: The case of Saudi Ministry of Education. International Business Research, 14(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v14n2p102

Armstrong, M. (2020). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance (6th ed.). Kogan Page Publishers.

Awan, S. H., Habib, N., Akhtar, C. S., & Naveed, S. (2020). Effectiveness of performance management system for employee performance through engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4), Article 2158244020969383. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969383

Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking case study research: A comparative approach. Routledge.

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Blömeke, S., Olsen, R. V., & Suhl, U. (2016). Relation of student achievement to the quality of their teachers and instructional quality. In T. Nilsen & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes (pp. 21–50). Springer. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/27946/1002053.pdf?sequence#page=29

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.

Canuto, P. P., Choycawen, M., & Pagdawan, R. (2024). The influence of teaching competencies on teachers' performance and students' academic achievement in primary science education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.29

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. https://doi.org/10.1188/14.ONF.545-547

Catalogo, M., & Doromal, A. (2022). Implementation of results-based performance management system: An approach for social change in the educational system. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 30(1), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v30i1.6319

Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Houghton Mifflin.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dale, E. (1946). Audio-visual methods in teaching. Dryden Press.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2018). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. Jossey-Bass.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Dessler, G. (2018). Human resource management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Esteban, J., Estuche, R., Navarra, R., Ragos, M. J. T., Tampil, R., & Tenedero, C. J. (2024). Improving teaching performance development: The implementation of results-based performance management system (RPMS). EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.787

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 527–544). Sage Publications.

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Teacher quality. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 1051–1078). Elsevier.

Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-18.1.2655

Hayes, A. M., & Bulat, J. (2017). Disabilities inclusive education systems and policies guide for low- and middle-income countries. RTI Press.

Heale, R., & Forbes, D. (2013). Understanding triangulation in research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101494

Kaarbo, J., & Beasley, R. K. (1999). A practical guide to the comparative case study method in political psychology. Political Psychology, 20(2), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00149

Klieme, E., & Nilsen, T. (2022). Teaching quality and student outcomes in TIMSS and PISA. In T. Nilsen, A. Stancel-Piątak, & J.-E. Gustafsson (Eds.), International handbook of comparative large-scale studies in education (pp. 1–34). Springer.

Kolawole, O. J., Damilola, O. W., Matthew, S. G., & Ayomitunde, A. T. (2022). Human capital development and sustainable development: Evidence from Nigeria. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Oeconomica, 67(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2478/subboec-2022-0005

König, J., Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Schlesinger, L., née Nehls, C. F., Musekamp, F., & Kaiser, G. (2021). The links between pedagogical competence, instructional quality, and mathematics achievement in the lower secondary classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10021-0

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583

Kurniawan, E. P., & Hariyati, N. (2021). Peranan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Dalam Pencapaian Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 1112-1123. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inspirasi-manajemen-pendidikan/article/view/43465

Levin, H. M., & Lockheed, M. E. (1991). Effective schools in developing countries. World Bank.

Li, Z., & Sun, N. (2023). Higher education quality (HEQ) improvement and economic growth in China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 29(4), 1638–1661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2023.2295770

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing instructional objectives. Fearon Publishers.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (2022). Performance report of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology for 2022.

Morgan, H. (2024). Using triangulation and crystallization to make qualitative studies trustworthy and rigorous. The Qualitative Report, 29(7), 1844–1856. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6071

Mosoge, M. J., & Pilane, M. W. (2003). Performance management: The neglected imperative of accountability systems in education. South African Journal of Education, 23(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120947

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Menjadi guru profesional: Menciptakan pembelajaran kreatif dan menyenangkan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: Relationships across countries, cohorts and time. Springer.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189–1208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1089059/

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Seyfried, M., Ansmann, M., & Pohlenz, P. (2019). Institutional isomorphism, entrepreneurship and effectiveness: the adoption and implementation of quality management in teaching and learning in Germany. Tertiary education and management, 25(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09022-3

Sintema, E. J. (2020). Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), Article em1851. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7893

Sudrajat, S. (2018). Manajemen Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 15(1), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v25i1.11576

Suryapriadi, Y. E., Gaffar, M. F., Wahab, A. A., & Komariah, A. (2020). Pengelolaan Guru Berbasis Kinerja di Sekolah Laboratorium (Labschool). Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v27i1.24411

Suyanto, S. (2021). Pendidikan karakter: Teori dan aplikasi. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tikly, L. (2011). Towards a framework for researching the quality of education in low-income countries. Comparative Education, 47(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.541671

Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wechsler, M. E., Kirp, D. L., Tinubu Ali, T., Gardner, M., Maier, A., Melnick, H., & Shields, P. M. (2016). The road to deeper learning: Examining the implementation and impact of Common Core in five California districts. Learning Policy Institute.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Zhang, Y., Kumar, S., Huang, X., & Yuan, Y. (2023). Human capital quality and the regional economic growth: Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 86, Article 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2023.101593

Zubair, A., Sasongko, R. N., & Aliman, A. (2017). Manajemen peningkatan kinerja guru. Manajer Pendidikan, 11(4), 270715. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/index.php/manajerpendidikan/article/view/3291

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Yuningsih, I., & Tejawiani, I. (2026). Teacher Performance Management in Improving Learning Achievement of Elementary School Students. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 5(1), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2759

Issue

Section

Articles