Systematic Curriculum Management and Teacher Performance Development
A Comparative Case Study in Rural Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56916/jirpe.v5i1.2761Keywords:
Merdeka Curriculum, Curriculum Management, PDCA, Teacher PerformanceAbstract
The implementation of Indonesia's Merdeka Curriculum faces significant challenges in rural schools, particularly regarding teacher performance affected by limited infrastructure and uneven competencies. This study examined how systematic curriculum management through the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle influences teacher performance development in two rural junior high schools. A qualitative comparative case study was conducted at SMPN 2 Naringgul and SMPN 3 Naringgul, Cianjur Regency, involving 4 school leaders and 28 teachers. Data were collected through observations (84 lessons), in-depth interviews, and document analysis over six months, then analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña's interactive model. Both schools successfully implemented varied teaching methods (75% of lessons) and created positive learning environments (89.5%), though digital technology integration remained weak (17.5%). SMPN 2 faced internal-psychological challenges with teacher confidence, while SMPN 3 confronted systemic infrastructure limitations. Academic supervision, formative assessment, and teacher reflection forums functioned effectively, yet documentation practices and systematic follow-up remained inconsistent. Findings demonstrate that PDCA-based curriculum management improves teacher performance when appropriately contextualized, though success depends on addressing both structural constraints and teacher self-efficacy simultaneously. The emergence of organic teacher leadership and adaptive management strategies proved crucial for implementation success. Results underscore the necessity of differentiated support approaches, job-embedded professional development, and sustained multi-year commitments to technology integration in resource-constrained rural contexts.
References
Amelia, M., Adriansyah, D., Setiawati, M., & Hayati, N. (2025). Pengaruh Manajemen Kurikulum Terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Pendidikan| E-ISSN: 3062-7788, 2(1), 211-216. https://jurnal.kopusindo.com/index.php/jimp/article/view/801
Archer, K., Savage, R., Sanghera-Sidhu, S., Wood, E., Gottardo, A., & Chen, V. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: A tertiary meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 78, 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.001
Arisandi, D., Dike, D., & Andayani, A. (2025). Pengembangan Modul Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Untuk Penguatan Locus Of Control Dan Self Efficacy Guru Di Wilayah 3t Kabupaten Sintang. VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(1), 16-31. https://jurnal.stkippersada.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/VOX/article/view/4518
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2019). The opportunity equation: Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Coburn, C. E., & Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 9(4), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2011.626729
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
Edutopia. (2021, April 15). The challenges of rural schools. https://www.edutopia.org/article/challenges-rural-schools
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, structure, processes (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Guide to implementing the Merdeka Curriculum. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.
Knies, E., Jacobsen, C., & Tummers, L. (2016). Leadership and organizational performance: State of the art and a research agenda. The Routledge Companion to Leadership, 426-440. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739854
König, J., & Pflanzl, B. (2016). Is teacher knowledge associated with performance? On the relationship between teachers' general pedagogical knowledge and instructional quality. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1214128
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Learning Policy Institute. (2017). Understanding and addressing teacher shortages in the United States. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/understanding-addressing-teacher-shortages
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Mahdum, M., Hadriana, H., & Safriyanti, M. (2019). Exploring teacher perceptions and motivations to ICT use in learning activities in Indonesia. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 293-317. https://doi.org/10.28945/4366
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Miller, A. (2023). Differentiated leadership: Meeting teachers where they are. Educational Leadership, 80(5), 34-39.
Moen, R., & Norman, C. (2006). Evolution of the PDCA cycle. Proceedings of the 7th ANQ Congress. https://www.westga.edu/~dturner/PDCA.pdf
Mwapwele, S. D., Marais, M., Dlamini, S., & Van Biljon, J. (2019). Teachers' ICT adoption in South African rural schools: A study of technology readiness and implications for the South Africa connect broadband policy. African Journal of Information and Communication, 24, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/28658
Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297
Pak, K., Desimone, L. M., & Parsons, A. (2020). An Integrative Approach to Professional Development to Support College-and Career-Readiness Standards. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(111), n111. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265332
Patel, P. M., & Deshpande, V. A. (2017). Application of plan-do-check-act cycle for quality and productivity improvement-A review. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), 5(1), 197-201. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3090183
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Plewa, C., Galán-Muros, V., & Davey, T. (2015). Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective. Higher Education, 70(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9822-1
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sangpikul, A. (2017). Implementing academic service learning and the PDCA cycle in a marketing course: Contributions to three beneficiaries. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 21, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.08.007
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2016). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sutrisna, V. A., & Rohmadi, S. H. (2024). Optimizing teacher performance management to improve the quality of Islamic education. Thawalib: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 399-408. https://doi.org/10.54150/thawalib.v5i2.474
Tobin, R., & Tippett, C. D. (2014). Possibilities and potential barriers: Learning to plan for differentiated instruction in elementary science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9414-z
Wohlstetter, P., & Mohrman, S. A. (1993). School-based management: Strategies for success. Finance and Governance, 2(4), 1-24. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Yang, J., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Huang, M., & Ma, Y. (2018). A study of K-12 teachers' TPACK on the technology acceptance of E-schoolbag. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1062-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1627560
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Retno Kuswahyuni, Ida Tejawiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
