Pronunciation Assessment: Traditional vs Modern Modes

Authors

  • Ali Babaeian Faculty of Education, The University of Sydney

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v1i1.530

Keywords:

Pronunciation Assessment, Traditional Mode, Modern Mode

Abstract

This article discusses the significance of pronunciation in linguistic competence and its role in effective communication for English speakers. It highlights the potential issues arising from human-rated pronunciation assessments, including inconsistency and bias. To overcome these challenges, the article examines the adoption of AI-powered platforms in pronunciation assessment. These platforms offer rapid results while maintaining high validity standards. They rely on technologies like Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and speech analysis programs to evaluate pronunciation skills based on suprasegmental features such as stress and intonation.The article also explores the future of AI-powered pronunciation assessment, which presents both opportunities and challenges. These platforms offer scalability, consistency, and personalized feedback, enhancing the learning experience. However, they must address issues related to scoring model validity, speech data diversity, ethical concerns, and the integration of human and machine feedback. In conclusion, the adoption of AI in pronunciation assessment is transforming language testing, offering advantages in terms of efficiency and accessibility while posing challenges related to validity and ethical considerations. Ongoing research and development will be essential to ensure AI-powered platforms meet the evolving needs of language learners and educators in large-scale language tests.

References

Balogh, J., Bernstein, J., Cheng, J., Van Moere, A., Townshend, B., & Suzuki, M. (2012). Validation of automated scoring of oral reading. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(3), 435-452.

British Council. (2023). Holistic approach. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/holistic-approach

Cámara-Arenas, E., Tejedor-García, C., Tomas-Vázquez, C. J., & Escudero-Mancebo, D. (2023). Automatic pronunciation assessment vs. automatic speech recognition: A study of conflicting conditions for L2-English. Language Learning & Technology, 27(1), 1–19.

Cambridge. (2023). Pronunciation Assessment. Language Teaching. Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-teaching/article/pronunciation-assessment/9F0B4A8F5C9E1A5B0E4D6D9C5F1E8F7A]

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (1996). Teaching pronunciation: A reference for teachers of English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.

Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. Routledge.

Chen, L., Zechner, K., Yoon, S. Y., Evanini, K., Wang, X., Loukina, A., ... & Gyawali, B. (2018). Automated scoring of non-native speech using the speechrater sm v. 5.0 engine. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1-31.

Chen, Y., Li, J., Wang, N., Zhang, Z., & Wei, X. (2020). Speech Recognition: Technologies and Applications. Springer.

Derwing, T. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents?. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 547-567.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 379-397.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2009). Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language teaching, 42(4), 476-490.

Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Vol. 42). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Field, J. (2005). Intelligibility and the listener: The role of lexical stress. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 399-423.

Harding, L. (2013). Pronunciation assessment. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 4521-4529). Blackwell

Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G. E., Mohamed, A. R., Jaitly, N., ... & Kingsbury, B. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal processing magazine, 29(6), 82-97.

Isaacs, T. (2017). Fully automated speaking assessments: changes to proficiency testing and the role of pronunciation. Routledge.

Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford university press.

Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.

Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11-30). Cambridge University Press.

Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL quarterly, 39(3), 369-377.

Levis, J.M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press.

Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2000). Measurement and assessment in teaching (81hEdition). New Jersey, USA: Prentiee Hall.

Marchant, G. J. (2004). What is at stake with high-stakes testing? A discussion of issues and research. Ohio Journal of Science, 104, 2-7.

Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2003). Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part I. Journal of applied measurement, 4(4), 386-422.

Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer-assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393–408.

Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2018). English pronunciation teaching and research: Contemporary perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.

Shohamy, E., & McNamara, T. (2009). Language tests and human rights. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 5–13.

Van Moere, A., & Downey, R. (2016). 21. Technology and artificial intelligence in language assessment. In Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 341-358). De Gruyter Mouton.

Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2011). ‘‘I Am Good at Speaking, But I Failed My Phonetics Class’’ Pronunciation and Speaking in Advanced Learners of English (pp. 117-130). Multilingual Matters.

Williamson, D. M., Xi, X., & Breyer, F. J. (2012). A framework for evaluation and use of automated scoring. Educational measurement: issues and practice, 31(1), 2-13.

Witt, S. M., & Young, S. J. (2000). Phone-level pronunciation scoring and assessment for interactive language learning. Speech communication, 30(2-3), 95-108.

Xiao, B., & Chen, C. (2020). A Review of Automatic Scoring Systems for Spoken English Proficiency Tests. IEEE Access, 8, 14900–14915.

Yates, L., Zielinski, B., & Pryor, E. (2011). The assessment of pronunciation and the new IELTS Pronunciation Scale. In IELTS Research Reports Volume 12, 2011 (pp. 1-46). Melbourne: IDP: IELTS Australia and British Council.

Young, S. J. (2001). Statistical Modeling in Continuous Speech Recognition (CSR). In UAI (Vol. 1, pp. 562-571).

Zhang, K., Wei, Y., Wang, K., Zhao, S., Liao, Q., Beatman, A., & Adeogba, D. (2020). Hierarchical Transformer for Pronunciation Assessment. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2020 (pp. 1-5).

Downloads

Published

2023-11-03

How to Cite

Babaeian, A. (2023). Pronunciation Assessment: Traditional vs Modern Modes . Journal of Education For Sustainable Innovation, 1(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v1i1.530

Issue

Section

Articles